> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://infosys.selmotech.com/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://infosys.selmotech.com/selmo-solution/selmo-solution-en/engineering-through-the-ages/mechanics-the-language-of-the-drawing.md).

# Mechanics – The language of the drawing

The **technical drawing** is one of the oldest and most important languages of engineering.

* Already in antiquity and with Leonardo da Vinci, machines were recorded in drawings.
* With industrialization the drawing was **standardized** (DIN, ISO) and became the universal means of communication.
* It shows **geometry, dimensions, tolerances, materials** – and is legally binding.

👉 No drawing, no manufacturing, no standard, no global collaboration.

<details>

<summary>Historical development</summary>

* **Antiquity**: construction drawings of Roman engineers (Vitruvius)
* **15th–16th centuries**: Leonardo da Vinci, highly detailed machine drawings
* **18th–19th centuries**: industrialization, drawing becomes the mandatory basis for manufacturing
* **20th century**: standardization (DIN, ISO) makes drawings internationally valid
* **Today**: CAD & digital twins → but the drawing remains the legal basis

</details>

## Mechanics – from clear representation to complex diversity

In mechanics there were also such “splits” or breaks between clarity and flexibility – albeit in a different way than in control engineering.

#### 1. Early mechanics (antiquity to 18th century)

* Plans and drawings were **rare** and were passed down more as sketches or manuscripts.
* Much was based on **craft tradition** → the knowledge resided in the master’s head.
* Advantage: clarity in the craft, simple structures.
* Disadvantage: little flexibility and no uniform documentation.

***

#### 2. Industrialization (19th century) – **introduction of the technical drawing**

* With industrial production the **technical drawing was standardized**.
* machines, components and production steps were **clearly documented**.
* Drawing = universal language of mechanics.
* Comparable to the **relay logic in the circuit diagram**: clear, traceable, securing competence.

***

#### 3. 20th century – **CAD and flexible modeling**

* Introduction of **CAD (Computer Aided Design)** from the 1960s.
* Drawing changed from a **static standard language** to a **dynamic 3D model**.
* Advantages: enormous flexibility, fast changes, simulation.
* Disadvantage: loss of the **clear paper standard** – today much is “hidden” in CAD (layers, parameters, assembly logic).
* Result: clarity for the layperson lost, specialized software and expertise required.

***

#### 4. Today – **digital twins & simulation**

* Models are no longer just drawings, but contain:
  * geometry
  * material data
  * manufacturing parameters
  * simulations
* Advantage: all-in-one documentation in the model.
* Disadvantage: **No longer understandable at a glance** – similar to PLC programming: only interpretable with special tools and know-how.

***

### Conclusion: Parallel to the PLC world

* In **mechanics** there was likewise a development from **clear, standardized language (technical drawing)** toward **high flexibility but lower transparency (3D-CAD, simulation)**.
* In **electrics/logic** it was similar: **clearly documented logic in the circuit diagram** was replaced by the **flexible but opaque PLC programming** .

👉 In both cases, digitization led to the **general readability and unambiguity being lost**.\
👉 And this is precisely where the demand for a **formal, understandable language for machine behavior** comes in – as a new third pillar.


---

# Agent Instructions
This documentation is published with GitBook. GitBook is the documentation platform designed so that both humans and AI agents can read, navigate, and reason over technical content effectively. Learn more at gitbook.com.

## Querying This Documentation
If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter, and the optional `goal` query parameter:

```
GET https://infosys.selmotech.com/selmo-solution/selmo-solution-en/engineering-through-the-ages/mechanics-the-language-of-the-drawing.md?ask=<question>&goal=<endgoal>
```

`ask` is the immediate question: it should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
`goal` is optional and describes the broader end goal you are ultimately trying to accomplish on behalf of the user. GitBook uses it to tailor the answer towards what is most useful for that goal.

The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.
